By Roger Bergen
Porter is a notoriously obscure and enigmatic style. Its current revival in Britain and America invites us to shed some light on its 19th and 20th century origins with the aid of period sources.
One of the pleasures of travel is stumbling across interesting and unique beers in odd parts of the world. I was fortunate enough to have such a serendipitous encounter a few years ago in the West Indies. I had recently arrived in St. Thomas to build a microbrewery. One day while pursuing a wharf-side liquor emporium in search of beer and the local rum ($1.69 a fifth), I stumbled across nothing less than a treasure trove of living fossils.
I was delighted to find that in the West Indies, stout is big, both figuratively and literally (the formidable Guinness Foreign Extra sells very well with the locals). As an aficionado of stout and a porter fanatic, I was close to heaven. In addition to the high-test Guinness, I found a lovely Tennant’s Cream Stout and the familiar Red Dragon Stout. I also found two Danish stouts: Carlsberg Imperial Stout/Gammel Porter and Ceres Stout, from a regional brewery in Jutland.
Carlsberg stout is a big beer, creamy and with tremendous balance and finesse, a worthy product even if it is bottom-fermented. It also testifies to the widespread lack of differentiation of stout and porter — both “Imperial Stout” and “Gammel [old] Porter” are printed on the label. But the Ceres Stout was the real find. Its “horsey” nose immediately gave it away as a true old-fashioned stock ale in the British style. I have encountered only one other such beer: Strong Suffolk Ale, by Greene King of England, another fossil beer that is evidence of a brewer’s dedication to keeping old traditions alive.* Michael Jackson states that Ceres Stout is also labeled Gammel Jysk Porter (Old Jutland Porter).
The Baltic stout and porter tradition derives from Britain’s tremendous export trade in the 18th and 19th centuries, of which the best-known survivor is the superlative Courage Russian Stout. This “export porter/imperial stout” style took root among the breweries of Denmark, Finland, and the Baltic states. Today, most Baltic porters and stouts are bottom-fermented, like Carlsberg Stout (from Denmark) and Koff Stout from Finland.
I cannot state definitely whether Ceres Stout is top-fermented, but it is clearly made using a Brettanomyces secondary fermentation. The resulting character is, uh, highly distinctive (wild “Bret” infection is often described as smelling like horse sweat). As with many of the odder Belgian ales, this apparent infection is actually the deliberate signature of a style. Today most brewers and drinkers definitely try to avoid “Bret” character, yet it was once the hallmark of an important branch of ale brewing. Ceres Stout/Gammel Jysk Porter is from a highly regarded, well-run modern brewery and is the result of careful attention to an almost extinct brewing practice: Hats off to Ceres. Beechwood chips seem like small potatoes compared to playing with a Brettanomyces culture in a lager brewery.
*Note that Flanders zuur beer derives its acidity from lactobacillus, whereas Strong Suffolk Ale definitely has the character of, and gets its acidity from, Brettanomyces.
Stock and Mild Ales: The British Tradition
During the 1800s, strong stock ales with a Brettanomyces secondary fermentation were the characteristic and definitive products of British ale brewers: porter, stout, and Burton and India pale ales were all universally made this way. Gradually, as the 19th century wore on, the strong stock ales lost favor to “mild,” “present-use,” or “running” beers (synonymous terms). Not only were these “mild” ales of “low” gravity — in the 1.050s, circa 1900 — they lacked the characteristic acidity of the Brettanomyces secondary fermentation.
In all probability, porter had long existed in two versions: a mild running beer (perhaps blended with a portion of vatted porter) and a stock ale. As others have theorized, the strong “stock porters” may have sometimes been known as stout porter in the 1700s. Certainly, as we have seen, confusion exists to this day in the Baltic countries. In England, Samuel Smith’s Brewery of Yorkshire brews a Nourishing Stout that is sold in the United States as Taddy Porter; it has a heavy enough body for a stout. Clearly, drawing a firm and fast line between porter and stout is often difficult and has been for a long time. In Britain and America, as public taste shifted toward the more modern-style running ales, porter became a mild beer, as we can see from period sources.
The Wahl-Henius American Handy Book of the Brewing, Malting, and Auxiliary Trades of 1908 is one of the best references that can be found for old brewing practices. It contains numerous references to porter and an interesting section on British ale brewing, mostly cribbed from English brewing books. The book gives extensive
descriptions of the then-current state-of-the-art ale brewing in Britain and the United States.
A table of gravities and hopping rates for English beers gives some interesting insights. London pale bitter ale has a quoted gravity of 14 Balling (SG 1.057) and a hopping rate of 1½–2 lb/U.S. barrel; London four ale (mild), 13–14 Balling (SG 1.053–1.057) and 45 –1¼ lb hops/barrel; and porter, 13–15 Balling (SG 1.053–1.061) and 45 –1½ lb hops/barrel. (Bear in mind that these were low alpha hops stored without refrigeration.) For porter and stout, all hops were added at the beginning of the boil, whereas for pale beers, 13–¼ of the total was added 15–20 min before kettle knock-out. Clearly, porter in England was well on the way toward eventual merger with dark mild ale, although at that time Britain’s excise tax system had not yet caused the general lowering of original gravities that it would later. Stock porters were apparently no longer brewed by this time, and English brewing practice clearly differentiated between porter and stout.
A section on British malting in Wahl-Henius book contains the following interesting note:
For mild ales, pale malt is used with a little black malt. Porter and stout are brewed in Dublin from high-dried pale malt (equivalent to modern mild ale malt) and black malt only, while London brewers generally prefer a grist containing all three qualities of colored malt, viz. amber, brown, and black, in addition to the pale malt. When black malt only is used in brewing porter and stout, one [part] of black, by measure, to seven of pale is sufficient for the blackest beers, and one [part] of black to twelve of pale is the smallest that is used even in Ireland, where the black beers are generally far less highly colored than in London.
Turn-of-the-Century Beer and Brewing Practice
Definitions and Descriptions of British and American Beers, circa 1908
“The beers brewed in the United Kingdom and its possessions show similar characteristic differences in their properties. … They are called ale, porter, and stout.
“Mild beers, whether ale, porter, or stout, are called such as undergo no secondary fermentation [sic], but are marketed about seven days after the principal fermentation is finished.
“Stock beers, or old beers, whether ale or stout, are such as have undergone a secondary fermentation and are stored about two months or more before marketing.
“The mild beers are distinguished from the stock beers by a more sweetish (mild) taste, containing more unfermented maltodextrin and less acid, the old beers, [sic] on the other hand, becoming more alcoholic and tart. …
“Stouts are quite dark, almost black, have a pronounced malt-caramel taste and aroma, a sweetish taste if mild, and a more or less tart taste, according to age and circumstances. They are brewed stronger than ales.
“Porter is brewed less strong than the old beers. It stands in a similar relation to stout as does a mild ale to a stock ale.
“The secondary fermentation of English stock beers — as shown by Claussen in 1904 — is entirely different from what is called secondary fermentation of, f.i., American or European beers … [it is] due, not to a genuine Saccharomyces, but to a certain torula, called Brettanomyces by its author … forming large quantities of acidic and ethereal substances, thus producing the typical flavor of the English stock beers.
“A pure cultivated yeast … cannot produce the flavor that is characteristic to stock or ale or stout, and is due exclusively to the action of Brettanomyces.
“[To make the secondary fermentation more reliable and predictable] Claussen recommends the addition of cultures of Brettanomyces to bring about the secondary fermentation.”)
Guidelines for Brewing American Porter and Stout, circa 1908
“The principal requirements, as compared with ale, are greater palatefulness, pronounced malt flavor, and darker color. It is best to use mixed malts, i.e., a mixture of high and low kiln-dried malts. If this cannot be had, caramel malt, ‘black’ malt, and sugar coloring [‘porterine’ or brewer’s caramel] to the required amount should be added.
“The mashing method and general treatment of porter and stout are the same as for stock ale [mash in at 65–66 °C (149–151 °F), then raise to 67.5 °C (154 °F) by underletting and stand one hour].
“Hops — Porter, one and one quarter pounds per barrel; stout, two and one-half pounds per barrel. Added in the same manner as for stock ale [three equal additions in a two-hour boil]. Sugar (if used) to the amount of 25 percent, added in the kettle 30 minutes before running out. Porter, 13 percent Balling [13 °P, SG 1.053]; stout, from 16 to 18 percent Balling [16–18 °P, SG 1.065–1.073].
“Fermentation like stock ale. No dry hopping. Store three to four months.” [Brettanomyces secondary fermentation was perhaps not standard practice in American ale breweries.]
—From R. Wahl and M. Henius, American Handy Book of the Brewing, Malting, and Auxiliary Trades, vol. II (Wahl-Henius Institute, Chicago, 1908).
Irish porters, then, were paler than their English counterparts. It is my belief that Murphy and Beamish stouts, notably paler and lighter bodied than Guinness, may well be surviving Irish porters rather than “true” stouts.
Porter's Tenacious Hold
Wahl and Henius define porter for the American brewer just before prohibition: “… Porter, with dark color, brewed like Stout, but not so strong”. The guidelines for brewing porter and stout, given in the section “TopFermentation Beers in the United States”, gives us a reasonably complete picture of what porter was like in the period just before Prohibition, when it still had popularity but was in decline. Notice that even then, it was virtually impossible to speak of porter without referring to stout. Never has the line been particularly clear, and that line is probably less definite now than 100 years ago because of the general fall of stout gravities.*
By World War II, porter was no longer produced in Britain. Irish porter technically died when Guinness stopped production in 1974. Curiously, as Michael Jackson relates, it had for some time been made with draught stout and a special blending beer in the pub, thus returning full circle to its 18th century origin (see Foster for discussion of “entire”). Murphy and in particular Beamish stouts may indeed be survivors under a different name, and the blackand-tan may be an approximation of Irish porter. Yet porter refused to die; the strong Baltic versions continued on, and a few porters survived in North America: Yuengling and (until relatively recently) Narragansett porters in the United States and Molson and Labatt’s Dow Cream porters in Canada. Yuengling Porter is notably pale and has some corn adjunct and is bottom-fermented. The Canadian big-brewery porters are soft and creamy, with a tendency to sweetness; they are also hard to find.
*According to Wahl-Henius, gravities were 16–18 °P (SG 1.065–1.073) for single stout, 18–20 °P (SG 1.073–1.080) for double stout, 20–25 °P (SG 1.080–1.100) for imperial stout, and >25 °P (SG >1.100) for Russian export stout.
Of course, thanks to the micro-brewery movement in the United States porter has been revived as a major ale style, and a major porter revival under way in Britain signifies porter as the new frontier in the real ale scene. What can be said about the state of the style?
Modern U.S. microbrewery porters range from 10 to 18 °P (SG 1.040–1.073). Most hover around 12–12.5 °P (SG 1.049–1.051). Bitterness can be from 20 to 45 IBU. One of the nontraditional features of many new American porters is hop aroma; a few are even dry-hopped. Note, however, that the Wahl-Henius book reports some late-hop aroma in American porters of 1908. Today many brewers tend to use the ubiquitous Cascade hop — whose bright geraniol aroma is not always appropriate to dark beers — rather than more traditional varieties like Fuggle/Willamette.
The grist bill is almost invariably based on a blend of pale lager malts with caramel and roasted malts. Most brewers seem to prefer the softer flavors of chocolate malt. Black malt, however, is used by a number of wellrespected porter brewers, including Sierra Nevada and Anchor, and this is traditional and appropriate if done with some restraint so that its sharp, acrid character is subdued. Roasted barley can be very nice in porter, especially if an Irish style is desired. Some brewers use a blend of two or all three of these malts. Color can range from dark reddish-brown to black, but porter should be paler and more translucent than stout, especially if both are in the brewer’s portfolio.
As with most dark beers, moderately carbonate water is traditional. London and Dublin both have carbonate water and are famous for their dark beers. Of course, modern water treatment techniques allow brewers to adjust virtually any water to a desired profile. Sulfates are less of a problem with porter than with stout because of the lower hopping rate. Chloride ions contribute palate fullness and are desirable in porter, helping to smooth out rough edges; either sodium or calcium chloride may be used.
Virtually any good ale yeast is acceptable. Naturally, an English or Irish yeast is appropriate when emulating the styles of those countries. Excessive fruitiness should perhaps be avoided in everyday-gravity porters but may be desirable in high-gravity versions. Attempting a stock porter with Brettanomyces secondary fermentation is the domain of only very brave souls. Brettanomyces cultures are available from UC Davis.
On the whole, porters should be fairly well attenuated — quite dry in the case of Irish porters. Sweet porters may be considered a legitimate variation on the style, in deference to porter’s close relationship to dark mild ale. A few micro and pub porters are very sweet indeed and might more appropriately be considered cream or sweet stouts. Modern porters are often both full of character and highly drinkable, and several of the best are highly representative of the mainstream of porter tradition but are world-class beers in their own right. Unfortunately, these relatively gentle beers can sometimes be overlooked in the black-beer lover’s quest for intense flavor.
All contents copyright 2019 by MoreFlavor Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this document or the related files may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher.